¡¸ ºô¸ô¤º¬ìÄ~Äò±Ð¨| ¡¸
¦³®Ä´Á¶¡¡G¥Á°ê 95¦~06¤ë01¤é ¦Ü 95¦~06¤ë15¤é ¤î

    Case Discussion

¨t²Î©Ê¬õ´³¯T½H¨Ö§ÜÁCà­¯g­Ô¸s

(antiphospholipid syndrome, Hughes syndrome)

<Case presentation>

Chief complaint
A 34 year-old female was admitted to the infectious disease ward because of fever, swelling of bilateral lower legs and a wound on the lateral malleolus of her left foot for more than one week


Past history
  1. Drug allergy(-), Food allergy(-)
  2. Smoke(-), Alcohol(-)
  3. Hypertension(-),DM(-)
  4. Surgical intervention(-)
  5. Occupation: nil
  6. Education: °ªÂ¾¹A¤u

Clinical course:  

  • 1994-April: She was admitted to our neurology ward due to incoherent, irrelevant speech and mild fever for 2~3 weeks. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) study and immunological data showed normal results. Major depression was suspected
  • 1994-May: She was admitted to our ophthalmology ward due to blurred vision. Optic neuritis R/O multiple sclerosis was suspected. But MRI showed ischemic change at left thalamus and bilateral hypothalamus. Vasculitis such as systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) was suspected.
  • 2003-April: She was admitted to our neurology ward due to intermittent numbness around the trunk associated with an unstable gait and urinary incontinence for 6 months. Agarose gel electrophoresis of CSF showed oligoclonal bands. The evoked potential response test was abnormal. MRI revealed multiple spinal cord lesions that were consistent with multiple sclerosis involving the spinal cord below C1 level. Multiple sclerosis was diagnosed. She received one course of interferon treatment. The sequelae were paraplegia and nearly total blindness. She lost to follow-up for more than 2 years and received herb drug treatment intermittently.
  • 2005-September: She got a wound on the lateral malleolus of left foot accidentally, then fever and swelling of bilateral lower legs developed. She was admitted to a local hospital due to suspected cellulitis. However after receiving antibiotics for three days, the fever persisted and the lower leg edema aggravated. Hence she was referred to our infectious disease department for further treatment.

Physical examination
Consciousness: clear, E4V5M6
Vital sign: BT:37.8, BP:112/70mmHg, RR: 18/min PR:76/min
Conjunctiva: not pale sclera: not icteric
Neck: supple, LAP(-) , JVE(-), goiter(-)
Chest: symmetric expansion,
   BS: decrease over bilateral lungs
   HS: regular heart rate, Gr II/VI Systolic murmur over LLSB
Abdomen: soft & obese
   L/S: impalpable
   Shifting dullness(-)
   No tenderness, no rebound pain
Extremities: paraplegia(+) but only light touch sensation(+), pain sensation(-)
   pitting edema of bilateral lower legs and feet(+)
   a wound on the lateral malleolus of left foot: erythema(+), local heat (+), yellow
   discharge with foul odor(+)
   Palpable inguinal LAPs(-)

Laboratory data 

  • WBC: 2830 Hb:11.1 MCV: 92.3 Platelet:140000 ESR: 96mm/1h ƒå
  • Urine protein(-) OB(-) sugar(-) RBC: 0-2/HPF, WBC: 2-5/HPF, Epi: 5-10/HPF ƒå
  • Stool OB(-) ƒå
  • TP: 6.5, albumin: 2.5, GOT:31, GPT:15, LDH: 149, BUN: 20, Cr:1.47, Na: 138, K: 4.8, CL: 107, AC sugar: 87, Cholesterol: 134, TG: 224, UA: 10.02 ƒå
  • CRP: 17.5 D-dimer: <324 mg/dl ƒå
  • S-iron: 47 mg/dl, UIBC: 143 mg/dl, Ferritin: 393.5 mg/dl
  • Immunological data: as the following table

 

1994-03

2003-04

2005-09

ANA

-

-

>1:2560

Anti-DS-DNA

-

-

>400

RA factor

14.1

139

167

VDRL

-

-

-

LE cell

-

-

 

C3

 

94

22.8

C4

 

11.6

5.67

IgG

1510

 

3370

IgA

 

 

328

IgM

 

 

101

PT

 

11.5/12.3

11.1/11.1

INR

 

0.88

0.94

PTT

 

31.6/27.1

30.2/29.1

aCL IgG

 

 

+ (79)

LAC

 

 

<1.2

Anti-Ro

 

 

(+) (>240)

Anti-La

 

 

(-)

Anti-Sm

 

 

(+) (>120)

Anti-RNP 

 

 

(+)(>240)

Anti-Jo-1

 

 

(-)

Anti-Scl-70

 

 

(-)

Chest PA: cardiomegaly R/O pericardial effusion,
                                       R/O pleural effusion

Cardiac echo

  • Moderate pericardial effusion ƒå
  • Moderate TR ƒå
  • Pulmonary hypertension

Classification criteria of SLE that this patient met:

  1. ANA(+)
  2. Oral ulcer(-)
  3. Malar rash(-)
  4. Discoid rash(-)
  5. Photosensitivity(-)
  6. Serositis(+)
  7. Renal disorder (-): urine protein(1+)
  8. Neurological disorder(+)
  9. Hematological disorder: WBC 2830
  10. Immunological disorder: anti-DS-DNA(+) anti-Sm(+), anti-phospholipid Ab(+)
  11. Arthritis(+)

Final diagnosis: 

  1. Systemic lupus erythematosus with CNS involvement
  2. Antiphospholipid syndrome

< Analysis>

      ¦hµo©Êµw¤Æ¯g¡A³Q»{¬°¬O¤@ºØ«I¥Ç¯«¸g¨t²Îªº¦ÛÅé§K¬Ì¯e¯f¡C¨ä¯S¼x¬Oµoª¢¡B¥hÅèÀT¤Æ (demyelination)¡B¤Îgliosis¡C¯f¤Hªº¯gª¬¥i¯à½w¸Ñ¡B´_µo©ÎªÌ«ùÄòªº´c¤Æ¡C

      ¦hµo©Êµw¤Æ¯g©M¤j¦h¼Æ¦ÛÅé§K¬Ì¯e¯f¤@¼Ë¡A¤k©Ê©~¦h¡A¨k¤k¤ñ¬ù¤@¤ñ¤G¡A¦nµo¦~ÄÖ¬ù20~40·³¡C¯f¤Hªº¦å¤¤¥i¯à¦s¦b¤@¨Ç¹ï§ÜÅèÀT§Ü­ìªº¦ÛÅé§ÜÅé¡A¨Ò¦panti-MOG§ÜÅé(myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein)¡CÁ{§É¯gª¬ªº¥X²{¥i¯à¬Oabrupt©Îinsidious¡C

      ¦hµo©Êµw¤Æ¯gªºÁ{§É¯gª¬¥]¬A¦Ù¦×µL¤O¡B¹B°Ê¤§«á¦Ù¦×§óµL¤O¡B¬Æ¦Ü¦ñÀHµÛpyramidal signs¨Ò¦pspasticity¡Bhyperreflexia ¤ÎBabinski's sign¡C¦¹¥~ÁÙ¦³ataxia¡Bµø¯«¸gª¢¡Bµø¤O´î°h¡B½Æµø¡B·Pı¯«¸g²§±`©Î³à¥¢¡B¯t·w¡B»H¯Ö¤Î¤j¸z¥\¯à¥¢±`¾É­PµLªk¸Ñ§¿¡B§¿¥¢¸T©Î«K¯µµ¥µ¥¡C

ªí¤@¡GInitial symptoms of MS

Symptom

Percent of cases

Symptom

Percent of cases

Sensory loss

37

Lhermitte

3

Optic neuritis

36

Pain

3

Weakness

35

Dementia

2

Paresthesias 

24

Visual loss

2

Diplopia

15

Facial palsy

1

Ataxia

11

Impotence

1

Vertigo

6

Myokymia

1

Paroxysmal attacks

4

Epilepsy

1

Bladder

4

Falling

1

Source: Harrison's principles of internal medicine 16th ed. P2462.

ªí¤G«h¬O¦hµo©Êµw¤Æ¯gªº¶EÂ_¼Ð·Ç¡A¥Ø«eMRI¤w¬O¶EÂ_¦hµo©Êµw¤Æ¯g¥²³ÆªºÀˬd¤u¨ã¡C

ªí¤G¡GDiagnostic criteria for MS

  1. Examination must reveal objective abnormalities of the CNS.
  2. Involvement must reflect predominantly disease of white matter long tracts, usually including
    (a) pyramidal pathways,
    (b) cerebellar pathways,
    (c) medial longitudinal fasciculus,
    (d) optic nerve, and
    (e) posterior columns.
  3. Examination or history must implicate involvement of two or more areas of the CNS.
    1. MRI may be used to document a second lesion when only one site of abnormality has been demonstrable on examination. A confirmatory MRI must have either four lesions involving the white matter or three lesions if one is periventricular in location. Acceptable lesions must be >3 mm in diameter. For patients older than 50 years, two of the following criteria must also be met: (a) lesion size>5mm, (b) lesions adjacent to the bodies of the lateral ventricles, and (c) lesions present in the posterior fossa.
    2. Evoked response testing may be used to document a second lesion not evident on clinical examination.
  4. The clinical pattern must consist of (a) two or more separate episodes of worsening involving different sites of the CNS, each lasting at least 24 h and occurring at least one month apart, or (b) gradual or stepwise progression over at least 6 months if accompanied by increased IgG synthesis or two or more oligoclonal bands. MRI may be used to document dissemination in time if a new T2 lesion or a Gd-enhancing lesion is seen or more months after a clinically isolated syndrome.
  5. The patient's neurologic condition could not better be attributed to another disease.

Diagnostic categories

  1. Definite MS: All five criteria fulfilled.
  2. Probable MS: All five criteria fulfilled except (a) only one objective abnormality despite two symptomatic episodes or (b) only one symptomatic episodes despite two or more objective abnormalities.
  3. At risk for MS: Criteria 1, 2, 3, and, 5 fulfilled; patient has only one symptomatic episode and one objective abnormality.

      §ÜÁCà­¯g­Ô¸s(antiphospholipid syndrome, Hughes syndrome)©ó1983­º¥ý¥Ñ­^°êG.R.V. Hughes±Ð±Â©Ò´y­z¡A¾ú¸g¦h¦~¬ã¨s¤Î°ê»Ú·|ij°Q½×¡A©ó1999¦~´£¥X§ÜÁCà­¯g­Ô¸sªºpreliminary classification criteria¡A¦pªþªí¡G(Arthritis Rheum 42: 1309, 1999)

      §ÜÁCà­¯g­Ô¸s¦]¬O§_¦ñÀH¨ä¥L¦ÛÅé§K¬Ì¯e¯f¤§¦³µL¦Ó¤À¬°­ìµo©Ê¤Î¦¸µo©Ê¡A¦¸µo©Ê§ÜÁCà­¯g­Ô¸s¸g±`¦ñÀHµÛ¨t²Î©Ê¬õ´³¯T½H¡C¨äÁ{§É¯S¼x¥D­n¬OÀR¯ß©Î°Ê¯ß¦å®ê©Î¬y²£¤Î¦å¤¤¦³¦s¦b§ÜÁCà­§ÜÅé¡CÁ{§É¯gª¬¨Ì¦å®êµo¥Í³¡¦ì¦Ó¦³¤£¦P¯gª¬¡A¨Ò¦p¸£¤¤­·¡BªÍ®ê¶ë¡B¸z¤lÃa¦º¡B«æ©ÊµÇ°IºÜ¡B«æ©Ê¤ß¦Ù±ð¶ëµ¥µ¥¡A°£¦¹¤§¥~¦³¨Ç¯f¤HÁÙ·|¥X²{ºôª¬«C´³(livedo reticularis)¡B¦ÛÅé§K¬Ì·»¦å©Ê³h¦å¡B»RÁЯg¡BªÍ°Ê¯ß°ªÀ£¡B¤ßŦ佤¯fÅܤް_¤ß°IºÜµ¥¡A¹êÅç«ÇÀˬd°£¤F§ÜÁCà­§ÜÅé¥~¡A¦³®É¥i¬Ý¨ì¦å¤pªO§C¤U¡B§Ü®Ö§ÜÅ鶧©Ê¡B§Ü¥h®ñ®Ö¿}®Ö¥Ì»Ä§ÜÅ鶧©Ê¡B³J¥Õ§¿¡BVDRL¶§©Êµ¥¡C¥»¯f¨Ò§ÜÁCà­§ÜÅéIgG°ª¹F79 GPL/ml¡A¦]¦¹¯f±w¥i¯à¦X¨Ö¦³¦¸µo©Ê§ÜÁCà­¯g­Ô¸s¡C¤£¹L¨Ì¾Ú¼Ú¬w1000¦ì§ÜÁCà­¯g­Ô¸s¯f¤Hªº²Î­p¸ê®Æ¡A§ÜÁCà­¯g­Ô¸s¸û¤Öµo¥Ímyelopathy (0.4%)¤Îµø¯«¸g¯fÅÜ (0.1%)¡C

      ¨t²Î©Ê¬õ´³¯T½H¨Ö¤¤¼Ï¯«¸g¨t²Î«I¥Ç¡A¥D­n¤À¬°¯«¸g(neurological)¤Îºë¯« (psychiatric)¨â¤è­±¡AÁ{§É¯gª¬¥]¬AÅöíw¡BÀYµh¡B¸£¤¤­·¡B¸£¥X¦å¡B­J¨¥¶Ã»yµ¥µ¥¡A¦¹¥~¦³®É·|¤Þ°_tranverse myelitis¡A³y¦¨paraplegia¡A¬Æ¦Ü©I§l°IºÜ¡C

      ¥»¨Ò­è¶}©l¦]µø¯«¸gª¢³QÃhºÃ¬O¦hµo©Êµw¤Æ¯g¡A¨Æ¹ê¤W«Ü¦h¦ÛÅé§K¬Ì¯e¯f¨Ò¦p¨t²Î©Ê¬õ´³¯T½H¡B­×®æ³s¯g­Ô¸sµ¥³£¥i¯à¤Þ°_µø¯«¸gª¢¡C¦]¦¹¥²¶·±q¹êÅç«ÇÀˬdªºµ²ªG¤Îªø´Á°lÂܯfµ{¤~¯à½T©w¯f¤Hªº¶EÂ_¡C

      ¦hµo©Êµw¤Æ¯g¡B§ÜÁCà­¯g­Ô¸s¤Î¨t²Î©Ê¬õ´³¯T½H¨Ö¤¤¼Ï¯«¸g¨t²Î«I¥Çµ¥¤TºØ¯f¡A¨äÁ{§É¯gª¬«D±`¬Û¦ü¡A«ÜÃøŲ§O¶EÂ_¡CG.R.V. Hughes±Ð±Âµ¥¾ÇªÌ©ó2005¦~©óRheumatology³o¥»Âø»xµoªí¤F¤@½g¤å³¹¡A±´°Q¤TªÌ¤§¶¡ªº®t²§¡A¨äµ²½×¦pªþªí¡G(Rheumatology 44:434-442, 2005)

MS: multiple sclerosis
PAPS: primary antiphospholipid syndrome
NPLE/APS: neuropsychiatric lupus with/without APS

Reference:  

  1. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 16th ed.
  2. Ferreia S, D'Cruz DP, Hughes GRV: Multiple sclerosis, neuropsychiatric lupus and antiphospholipid syndrome: when do we stand? Rheumatology 2005; 44:434-442
  3. Kelly's Textbook of Rheumatology, 7th ed.

Ä~Äò±Ð¨|¦ÒÃD
1.
(A)
¤U¦C­þ¤@ºØ¦ÛÅé§K¬Ì§ÜÅé¹ï¨t²Î©Ê¬õ´³¯T½H¦³¸û°ªªº±M¤@©Ê¡H
Aanti-Sm
Banti-Ro
Canti-RNP
Danti-smooth muscle
Eantiphospholipid
2.
(C)
Drug induced lupus©M­þ¤@ºØ¦ÛÅé§K¬Ì§ÜÅé¸û¦³Ãö¡H
Aanti-Sm
Banti-ds-DNA
Cantihistone
Danti-Ku
Eanti-Jo-1
3.
(E)
¤U¦C­þ¤@­Ó²´¯e¥i¯à¥X²{¦b¨t²Î©Ê¬õ´³¯T½Hªº¯f¤H¨­¤W¡H
Adry eye
Boptic neuritis
Cretinal vasculitis
Dcataract
Eall of above
4.
(E)
¤U¦C¦³Ãö©ó ¡§pregnancy and lupus¡¨ ªº±Ô­z¦óªÌ¬°»~¡H
AFertility rates for men and women with SLE are probably normal.
BRate of fetal loss is increased in women with SLE.
CFetal demise is higher in mothers with high disease activity or nephritis.
DHeparin may be necessary for mothers with SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome.
E¥H¤W¬Ò«D
5.
(E)
¤U¦C¦³Ãö¥þ¨­©Ê¬õ´³¯T½Hªº±Ô­z¡A¦óªÌ¬O¿ù»~ªº¡H
AÃö¸`µh³Ì±`¨£¡C
BÁy³¡¬õ´³¤£¤@©w¬O½¹½º¼Ë
C¤fµÄ¼ìºÅ¨Ã«D¬O¥þ¨­©Ê¬õ´³¯T½Hªº±M§Q
D¦å²M¸ÉÅé¿@«×¦b¬¡°Ê´Á¡A¤j³¡¥÷¬O­°§Cªº
ELa(SSB)¦ÛÅé§ÜÅé»P¯T½HµÇª¢ªºµo¥Í¦³±K¤ÁÃö«Y
6.
(B)
¤U¦C¦³Ãö§ÜÁCà­¯g­Ô¸sªº±Ô­z¡A¦óªÌ¬O¿ù»~ªº¡H
AVDRL ¥i¯à¥X²{°²¶§©Ê¡C
B¦]©öµo¥Í¦å®ê¡A¦]¦¹¦å¤pªOµ´¤£¥i¯àµo¥Í§C¤U¡C
C¥Ö½§¥i¯à·|¦³livedo reticularisªºªí²{¡C
D¥i¯à¥X²{ªÍ®ê¶ë©ÎªÍ¥X¦å¡C
E ªvÀø¥H§Ü¾®¦å¾¯¬°¥D¡C
7.
(C)
¤U¦C¦³Ãö¦hµo©Êµw¤Æ¯gªº±Ô­z¡A¦óªÌ¬O¿ù»~ªº¡H
A¨k¤k¤ñ¬ù1¤ñ2
B¦nµo©ó20¦Ü40·³
C¤é¥»¤Hªºµo¥Í²v¬O¥þ¥@¬É³Ì°ªªº
D©MTh1 cytokine¦³Ãö
E¥i¨Ï¥Î°ª¾¯¶qinterferon-bªvÀø
8.
(C)
¤U¦C¦³Ãö©ó¦ÛÅé§ÜÅ骺´y­z¦óªÌ¥¿½T¡H
AThe anti-dsDNA titer is not correlate with disease activity.
B Anti-La is associated with increased risk for congenital heart block
CAnti-RNP is associated with mixed connective tissue disorder.
DThe anti-dsDNA is associated wih decreased risk for lupus nephritis.
E¥H¤W¬Ò¥¿½T
9.
(E)
¤U¦C¦³Ãö¥þ¨­©Ê¬õ´³¯T½Hªº±Ô­z¡A¦óªÌ¬O¿ù»~ªº¡H
A The most frequent hematologic manifestation of SLE is anemia.
BIncreases in serum AST and ALT are common when SLE is active.
CThe most common pulmonary manifestation of SLE is pleuritis with or without pleural effusion.
DFor SLE patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, plasma exchange
E¥H¤W¬Ò«D
10.
(D)
¤U¦C¦óªÌ¤£¥]¬A¦b³Ì·s¥þ¨­©Ê¬õ´³¯T½H¤§¤Q¤@ÂI¤ÀÃþ¼Ð·Ç¤º¡G
A¦hµo©ÊÃö¸`µh
B¦Ø½¤ª¢¤Î¿n¤ô
CÅöíw
D¤ò¾v®e©ö²æ¸¨
E·»¦å©Ê³h¦å

µª®×¸ÑªR 

  1. (A)
  2. (C) Anti-Sm is highly specific for SLE. Anti-Ro is not specific for SLE and associated with Sicca syndrome, SCLE, neonatal lupus with congenital heart block. Anti-RNP is associated with overlap syndrome. Anti-smooth muscle Ab is associated with autoimmune hepatitis. Anti-dsDNA: High titers are SLE-specific. And in some patients correlate with disease activity, nephritis, vasculitis. Anti-histone : more frequent in drug-induced SLE Anti-Ku & anti-Jo-1: associated with dermatomyositis
  3. (E) SLE¦³®É·|¦³¦¸µo©Ê­×®æ³s¯g­Ô¸s¦Ó¦³°®²´¯g¡A¦¹¥~¦³¤Ö¼Æ¯f¤H·|¿©±wretinal vasculitis ©Î optic neuritis¦Ó¾É­P¥¢©ú¡C³Ì«á¯f±w¦]ªA¥ÎÃþ©T¾J¤§¬G¦Ó¾É­P¦­µo©Ê¥Õ¤º»Ù©Î«C¥ú²´¡C
  4. (E) ABCD ¥|­Ó±Ô­z§¡¥¿½T
  5. (E) Anti-Ro and anti-La are associated with decrease risk for nephritis
  6. (B) §ÜÁCà­¯g­Ô¸sªº¯f¤H¦å¤pªO±`±`¥u¦³40000~100000/mm3 ¡A¦ý¯f¤H¤´³B©óhypercoagulable state.¡C
  7. (C) °ª½n«×°ê®aµo¥Í²v¸û°ª¡A¤é¥»¤Hµo¥Í²v¤ñ¥ÕºØ¤H§C«Ü¦h¡C
  8. (C) µª®×¸Ñ»¡¦P²Ä¤@ÃD¡B²Ä¤GÃD
  9. (E) ABCD ¥|­Ó±Ô­z§¡¥¿½T
  10. (D) ¤ò¾v®e©ö²æ¸¨¤£¦b¤Q¤@ÂI¤ÀÃþ¼Ð·Ç¤º


Top of Page